6 Stone Jars Marriage Preparation Resources for Catholic Singles

Guidance on Catholic dating, courtship, relationships and marriage in the name of
fostering successful marriages that are permanent, faithful and fruitful.

Ask Anthony your questions about Catholic Dating and Marriage Retreats and Trips for Single Catholics Road to Cana Series Video Clips Subscribe options for 6 Stone Jars: Is a modest wedding gown essential?

Is a modest wedding gown essential?

Dear Anthony,

I read your answer to the person asking about wedding gowns. To me, getting caught up with nonessential things like a modest gown is distracting from what is important, which is the sacrament of Matrimony. Why does it matter so much what the bride wears, as long as the couple is receiving the sacrament?


A modest wedding gown may be getting harder to find, but I don’t think couples consider the bride’s gown as an “essential” part of the ceremony. I agree that people get too distracted with nonessentials and should focus on the sacrament. But the bride’s wedding gown is a critical component. Granted, saying it is “essential” would not be the right word, but it has high importance, primarily in what it represents.

Sacraments have to do with "outward signs" that indicate an inner mystery. "Sign" and "mystery" are the key words. The sacrament of marriage is a tremendous mystery. The mystery of two becoming one; the mystery of sacramental grace uniquely given to the two persons; the mystery of Christ entering the marriage union; the mystery of the bride and groom being a living sign of the mystery of Christ's marriage to His bride, the Church.

Then there is the mystery of the bride herself, particularly her body.

It's a shame that so many marriages take place between two people who have already exposed much of their bodies to each other, but especially a woman exposing her body to the man. A wedding night is supposed to be an unveiling of the mystery of the woman that has been kept hidden from the man during their time together before marriage. The wedding ceremony is an exchange of rights to each other's body. The wedding night (the time of consummation of the marriage) is meant to be an incredibly profound and unique moment for the two; it is when they unveil their bodies to each other to experience that which is reserved only for two people who have publicly given each other "rights" to the other's body for those purposes unique to marriage and conjugal love.

We clothe our bodies every day because we have that sense deep down that we should, and that certain parts are especially sacred and meant for sacred purposes. The continued public display of more and more flesh is an indication that people have lost the sense of shame that Adam and Eve displayed in the Garden of Eden after the fall, which shows us how connected sin and clothing the body are. Therefore, the sense of sin is in direct proportion to exposure of the body.

It does seem that society has become "desensitized" to sin. But more than this, people have lost the sense of purpose for their bodies, thus, a loss of the sense of mystery. It has become a focus in many ways. People are leading with their bodies instead of their minds. Self-mastery over the body is not practiced as it should be. In fact, an overindulgence in body worship is prevalent, and leading people to believe that exposing the body has no effect on the way people behave, and is something to be proud of and unashamed to reveal.

This downplaying of the purpose of the body, and the disconnection between the body and mystery, has, with no surprise, contributed to sexual promiscuity, and that includes Catholics. Virginity and chastity are not held up as the ideals they should be, and pre-marital sex becomes a norm and (sorry to say) even an expectation.

But in fact, the body is a great mystery! A man and a woman should expose as little as possible of their bodies to one another (certainly, at the very least, never exposing those areas meant for genital sexual expression). Why? Because the body IS sacred! Without the body, we cannot know anything about God. Without the body, we cannot get to heaven. Without the body, we cannot properly worship God. Without the body, we cannot co-create human life and propagate the human race. Without the body, we cannot LOVE!!!

The body has a purpose. Its purpose is so sacred, it is a mystery. Every person should preserve the mystery of love, which is fundamentally a preserving of the mystery of our bodies. Exposing our bodies before marriage is to prematurely "reveal" the mystery, thus ending the mystery that was meant for the wedding night.

There are also the "signs" in a wedding ceremony. The woman's body, being the great mystery that it is, absolutely should be veiled. And to be covered in a white garment makes sense, too. The color "white" is a symbol of purity, primarily purity of intention to give her whole person to this man. A bride traditionally looks so adorned because she is a priceless mystery that is about to be given. The groom is about to accept this mystery with love and noble intentions, and he will accept the gift of her body, giving him the sole and unique "right" to her body for the purposes of love. The bride will have her veil pulled back and her face will be revealed. The groom will later have the awesome privilege of unveiling her entire body and then, as Scripture so beautifully puts it, will "know her". In other words, he will accept the right to her body ONLY for the purposes of having that right; namely, the conjugal act that is meant to make her a mother (thus, the definition of the word “matrimony”).

The body of Christ, the Church, is that tremendous mystery in which Christ brings about new life through the womb of his bride, the baptismal font, in the sacrament of Baptism. The womb of the woman has as its primary purpose the receiving of the husband’s gift and the conception and development of new life. The mystery of a woman is a visible sign of the mystery of the Church, the body of Christ. The children born are the incarnation of the great mystery of love between a man and woman. The birth of a person into eternal life through the baptismal font of the Church, Christ's bride, is the great mystery of love between Christ and man. The Incarnation of the Son of God become man is the great mystery of God's love for the human race; that His Son would take a human body and use that body to consummate His marriage to His Church by dying on the Cross.

The marriage of a man and a woman is a profound invitation to share in the redemption of the world and participation in the Cross. True love, therefore, is sacrificial and a total self-donation to the other.

When you consider the deep mystery of love and marriage, you naturally come to the conclusion that a bride (and women in the wedding party, for that matter) with an exposed body is inappropriate, perhaps even scandalous. But being fully dressed in clothing that lacks the sacramental symbolism is also inappropriate. A marriage ceremony must be given the dignity it deserves. It is right to invest in it and externally represent the sacramental reality. Of course, if finances or some other practical reality prevent making this possible, focus only on the essentials. But don’t underestimate the importance of the gown and the bride’s body being covered. At least wrap something nice around what is still exposed from the gown.

Comments (Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)
Sarah Cumming's Gravatar Beautifully said.
# Posted By Sarah Cumming | 10/10/08 4:38 PM
L A's Gravatar Why is "less" shame if a man exposes too much of his body? It is NOT.
Symbols aside, if the man didn't keep the proper modesty (and therefore his chastity) why should that not be a shame?

Let's be clear. God didn't invite modesty or chastity for the woman only, and it's on BOTH sides the commitment and resposibility to preserve it.
# Posted By L A | 10/11/08 7:43 AM
L A's Gravatar "a bride (and women in the wedding party, for that matter) with an exposed body is inappropriate, perhaps even scandalous. ****But being fully dressed in clothing that lacks the sacramental symbolism is also inappropriate. ****"

According to the possibilities of the family, a simple White dress, not necessarily a gown, can be sufficient sacramental symbolism.

My mother was wearing a plain, simple, really cheap white dress. She couldn't do her dream of having a beautiful wedding gown. Yet, after years of not having proper meals and living in extremely harsh conditions of rural Mexico, she has been blessed with almost 40 years of marriage.
Of course, her dress was modest. It was simple and extremely plain. The white color was plenty of sacramental symbolism.
I'm sure God agrees.
# Posted By L A | 10/11/08 7:56 AM
John Arkison's Gravatar Nooo. The wedding dress is strictly a cultural thing. Meaning can be ascribed to it, that meaning lies in the viewer. A culture portrays a sacrament in its own cultural terms, the sacrament is not bound by those terms. Modest white wedding dresses are nice and if they make the bride and others happy that is a good thing. That doesn't mean there aren't other ways to handle the matter that also work well. Choices based on rigidity don't serve a useful symbolic purpose.

Such wedding dresses look great, they just aren't necessary.
# Posted By John Arkison | 10/11/08 12:20 PM
Christy L's Gravatar Well put Anthony. This is a nice reminder for us. Modest isn't a fashion fad. None of the truths of our faith our cultural. If something is important, it is important always. What could take away from the sacrament is the occasion of sin we often unintentionally lead others to with the way we dress. If this virtue is dear to us, ideally we will give our yes to modesty over fashion or self-image.
# Posted By Christy L | 10/11/08 10:27 PM
Angela's Gravatar This was a great article. I don't like the modern "norm" of strapless wedding gowns. I think they look scandalous, like the bride is wearing a towel on the top. Most wedding gowns (and bridesmaid gowns) can be made appropriate by wearing a nice shawl or a scarf on the top!
# Posted By Angela | 10/13/08 11:39 AM
Sarah's Gravatar Keep in mind that most wedding dress shops or sewers will add sleeves or straps for a nominal charge.
# Posted By Sarah | 10/13/08 12:02 PM
Dennis's Gravatar I've been told that there are parish priests who have cracked down on strapless gowns, etc. However, as a guy, I have had women friends tell me about "ugly bridemaids dresses". I've also had women friends who were able to find nicer bridemaids dresses that you could wear later on to say, a formal dinner party.

About dress, a guy at work got married one weekend when an unexpected cold front came in - I could just picture his bride and her bridesmaids freezing.

Actually, a girl I knew in college improvised a wedding gown from buying a white formal dress and then her mother made her a veil - thought that was different.

Personally, some of the best weddings I attended I thought where the more simple ones. For one of my best friends, I sprung a rental on a Lincoln Continental from a rental car placed in lieu of a limo - which was a nice touch.

A marriage is a lifetime - and an engagement involves much more than planning a wedding.
# Posted By Dennis | 10/18/08 10:17 AM
Anthony Buono is the founder of Ave Maria Singles
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9.002. Contact Us