6 Stone Jars Marriage Preparation Resources for Catholic Singles

Guidance on Catholic dating, courtship, relationships and marriage in the name of
fostering successful marriages that are permanent, faithful and fruitful.

Ask Anthony your questions about Catholic Dating and Marriage Retreats and Trips for Single Catholics Road to Cana Series Video Clips Subscribe options for 6 Stone Jars: Friendship from a Man Follow 6stonejars on Twitter
 

Friendship from a Man

Women have an uncanny ability to make friends and be a friend. A good way to put it is that women are, by nature, inclined to care. Specifically, women care about people. They intuitively are capable of entering into the inner reality of human beings. This makes them capable of friendship.

It does not surprise anyone that women make friends with other women so easily. They show interest in each other. They enjoy the sharing of personal information. They pursue with sincerity knowing more about the person behind the external presentation.

Men, on the other hand, are primarily interested in the outer world. By nature, men focus on the “what” more than the “who” in life. Of course, I am not saying that men don’t have the ability to “care”. I’m only pointing out that women have an easier time at friendship than men do. Men get to know each other through actions rather than conversation. They do not sit down and start sharing what’s going on inside or their likes and dislikes. They just act, and they talk within situations, and knowledge about that man is revealed as he goes along. That is why men are much more transparent than women. You can know what a man is thinking or what he wants because he externalizes himself. Women keep things hidden inside and are hard to read externally.

Why is this so important to consider? It is because in dating relationships and in marriage, there can be an overstressing by women to have a man be their “best friend” at a level that is probably unrealistic. I’m all for friendship in courtship and marriage, but the friendship required for marriage needs to be defined and understood. It cannot be understood to mean that a woman will be getting someone she can converse with anytime she wants and about anything.

To really get to know any person, there must inevitably be spoken conversation. The reason is that you can never “really” know what someone is thinking or experiencing at the personal level, or why they did something, unless they speak about it. Actions may very well reveal truths about a person, but actions do not provide all the information about the whole person. So men do have to talk and be able to make conversation with a woman. He can’t just be too shy and not a talker at all.

By definition, a person is a being who acts. So what someone does speaks about who they are. However, as human beings, we have a fallen human nature that inclines us to sin. And, in fact, we all sin every day. Should our sinful actions be what defines us as a person? It would be unfair to do so, because everyone is entitled to the freedom to fall from grace and be forgiven and given another chance. How we recover from these falls tells much more about the person. Obviously, someone who keeps doing the same things over and over again is probably unlikely to stop doing them. So actions should be judged over time, rather than in moments.

This is the courtesy men desperately need from women today because men are more action-oriented than women. Therefore, men are prone to do more stupid things than women. Men need the benefit of the doubt from a woman if he is ever going to risk the level of friendship that women want.

Women have to understand, however, that men typically do not “need” the kind of deep friendship that women want. This is why it is important for women to have close female friendships. There are needs women have at the friendship level that should not be expected from a man. I realize that there is an ideal in modern marriage that a man and a woman be best friends, but this must not distract from the practical aspects of the vocation to marriage in the eyes of God. The two become one flesh, but not one person. There will always be two unique individual persons in a marriage, which means the personhood of both will always be developing and forming. The friendship bond in marriage provides love, security, sacrifice, and interest in the other’s good and welfare. In this friendship they cannot help but grow closer together.

But it is impossible for a man to fulfill a woman completely, nor a woman to fulfill a man completely. First and foremost, only God can completely fulfill any person. That’s a given. But also, people need other people to continue making them the whole person they are called to be. Some couples have terrible problems dealing with what the other does outside of themselves. There is a possessiveness that makes them hate when the person they are dating or married to does something without them or doesn’t tell them everything they expect to hear. They feel betrayed because they believe that true love means you do every single thing together and only share everything with just that one person. They also do not like it if anything they talk about together is shared with anyone else.

This is not what marital friendship is. Friendship does not mean possessing every single bit of information about the other, nor doing every single thing together or else love is not true or real. There are couples who do happen to have that. But many good couples have ended their relationships because they didn’t have this. And that is wrong. Women will find it difficult to find a man who desires to tell her everything and wants to do everything with her. Some men might be like that but most are not. Men definitely have to open up more to women, but women definitely have the need of a friend they can open their heart to; to talk about everything. Typically, women find this in another woman. That’s why there are so many happy marriages where each spouse has their same-sex friends. These friendships outside the couple enhance the person and make them better spouses to each other.

Women must not put so much pressure on a man to be a conversational friend they need. But men do need to talk more to women. Women need to have conversation. They need to know what’s going on inside. Many times a man does not even know himself enough inside to share himself. Women must be patient about that.

Don’t give up on a good man who defines who he is by his actions. Just because he does not talk as much as you would like does not mean he would not make a good husband and father. Make sure you have friends who make you a better person, and take that betterment and bring it faithfully into dating and marital friendship.

Comments (Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)
GE's Gravatar Couldn't agree more with this -- and I know, as a man, it doesn't excuse me, but I've also witnessed first hand how depressed young ladies can get if they don't feel "fulfilled" in friendship/conversation with a prospective spouse.

It reminds me of Sense & Sensibility, where the only man 'good' at conversation and wooing women's hearts turns out to be a flake, whereas the other two men slowly but surely win the trust and admiration of the young ladies whom they court.
# Posted By GE | 4/29/09 12:14 PM
Eunice's Gravatar Mr. Buono,
Sincere thanks for your meditation. I agree with you. As a woman I need to share my feelings good or bad with a man, not a shoulder to cry on, however many times I can not find it.
# Posted By Eunice | 4/29/09 3:58 PM
Z's Gravatar What mature, sexually-integrated women seek is mature, sexually-integrated men, not sexual stereotypes. Blessedly gender does NOT have to be categorized, because EVERY human being is "imago dei."
# Posted By Z | 4/29/09 5:40 PM
John's Gravatar Well said. Thanks for this artilce. Having balanced expectations is a tricky thing, and you've described most men's experience well.
# Posted By John | 4/29/09 6:04 PM
M's Gravatar This piece spoke to my soul today. I feel as though it were written for me. Thank you for sharing.
# Posted By M | 4/29/09 10:04 PM
Mary Ann Nace's Gravatar Anthony, I always enjoy reading your writings and this most recent really hit home with me.Your points are so true. I can not help reflecting on my 27 years of marriage with my deceased husband. Chuck was not a "home talker" for sure. By this I mean, because his job was the operations of a large company, he dealt all day with the employess who were predominately female. With them he was personable, funny and very sympathetic when need be to all who worked for him, as they would kindly tell me each year at the annual Christmas Party. At home he was pretty serious, relaxed and mostly quiet. Yes, I did most of the talking. As years went on I really started to notice more and more that he was not communicating very much and it started to bother me for the first time. I questioned him about it on a car trip to the shore and he told me honestly that all day long he had to be engaging people as part of his job. He felt this was a real effort because(as he said), "that's really not my personality">At the end of the day he felt exhausted and looked forward to having quiet time. I guess in retospect,this was kind of selfish on his part but I really sympathized with him and had a new and accepting understanding of his quietness. Chuck was 8 years older than I and I now understand how that age difference can also affect energy levels as well. I never looked to him to be my best friend. He was my spouse. He was loving in his kind and generous nature as well as a hard woker and good provider to his family. He was also a great father to our son and we both still miss him terribly some 8 years since his death.Anthony you are so right in saying a husband need not be your best friend or even a great communicator to be a cherished spouse. He was a great husband in my estimation. I have a small circle of girlfriends that I enjoy doing all the girlie things with and I never tried to make him something he wasn't. I guess I believe women should let men be men, after all that's why we fell in love with them in the first place!
# Posted By Mary Ann Nace | 4/30/09 1:46 PM
Richard's Gravatar I agree, looking back at my last relationship of 6 years I found my self being the bestfriend and when I wasn't her dad filled the position which in my case was worse, being that her dad was the complet polar opposite of me, ultimatly the cause of our break up.....
# Posted By Richard | 4/30/09 10:40 PM
Patricia's Gravatar Thank you for this article. It was informative. I hope I get to apply the knowledge someday!
Reminds me of my mom and dad. My dad was a quiet man and my mom use to complain about how he never talked to her! When I would come home for visits as an adult, my mom and I would chat away for hours. My dad would then tease us about how his ears were "ringing"! I think my mom came to the same understanding as Mary Ann. My dad's still alive today, my mom passed on in 1993. I've only come to realize these last few years what an exceptional husband and father my dad has been! Not a talker, but a doer and a faithful husband and a concerned loving father. I think many men have in within themselves to be good husbands and fathers, if we women generally understand men are persons of action.
# Posted By Patricia | 5/4/09 9:48 AM
Donna's Gravatar I'm a woman, but I recognize myself in your description of 'what men are like' - defining myself by what I do, keeping a lot of things to myself, etc. Quite bluntly, when other women have tried to 'open up' to me I get nervous and embarrassed. I find much female companionship to be too clingy and subjective for me. What is the atypical individual supposed to do ?
# Posted By Donna | 5/19/09 10:17 PM