6 Stone Jars Marriage Preparation Resources for Catholic Singles

Guidance on Catholic dating, courtship, relationships and marriage in the name of
fostering successful marriages that are permanent, faithful and fruitful.

Ask Anthony your questions about Catholic Dating and Marriage Retreats and Trips for Single Catholics Road to Cana Series Video Clips Subscribe options for 6 Stone Jars: Compatibility: A Closer Look Follow 6stonejars on Twitter
 

Compatibility: A Closer Look

I read a lot of marriage and relationship books. The subject of compatibility comes up often. One I read recently concluded that a marriage can legitimately be over if compatibility problems are discovered along the way. This idea of compatibility being the basis of a good and happy marriage is widely accepted.

As a Catholic, I am not a fan of marriages ending at all. However, marriages do end, and practically speaking I recognize that some marriages end for good reason. If this were not true, there would be no such thing as declarations of nullity from the Catholic Church. Compatibility is something I would recommend that couples have as they determine their decision to get married. But the word does not mean what it has come to now mean; namely, a congruence of interests. This makes compatibility mean that the individuals of the couple have similarities that make it very easy to be together. Even the thesaurus on this Microsoft Word software says that “compatible” means “well-suited”.

Couples with a congruence of interests make marriage look easy. Where there is a congruence of interests, there seems to be no issue of age gap. I am thinking about the great Catholic philosopher, Dietrich Von Hildebrand who married a woman 34 years younger than him, Alice Von Hildebrand. Their deep interest in the Catholic faith and philosophy brought them together and gave them a congruence that made it so age did not matter. Their marriage endured, and Alice has been a widow for many, many years. But she, of course, would never trade the years she had with this man she loved with all her heart.

Does this mean you cannot have a happy and loving marriage if you don’t have similar interests? If you have more differences than similarities?

Many people feel this way, and this definition of “compatibility” is widely accepted. I need to remember what people mean when they speak about “compatibility”. Who wouldn't want to be with someone who is well-suited for them?

However, this is not what the word “compatibility” originally meant. I am a words person. I like to know how an English word came into being; what the roots are for the word. When you look at the Latin roots of the word “compatibility” you find the following:

  • “Com” means “with”
  • "Pati” comes from the Latin verb “Patior” or “Patiri”, which means “to suffer; to endure”. We get the word “patience” from this Latin verb. The word “passion” in the context of Jesus’ suffering comes from this Latin verb as well.  Other keys Latin roots are “patiens” and “patientia”, both meaning patience,  endurance, suffering.
  • “Ability” or “able” means “capacity” or “capable”

The real meaning of “compatibility” is “the capacity to suffer with another person.” In the context of marriage, compatibility is connected to the vow to love one another through sickness and health, for better and worse. It is the bearing of one another for the sake of the other. To endure the unpleasant times or moments with patience.

Do you have the capacity to patiently endure and suffer things that the person whom you choose to marry will present to you? If you do, then you have a key qualification for being a married person.

Suppose your spouse loves to talk about soccer all the time, read books about it, and watch the World Cup on television. They express this interest to you with great enthusiasm. You, on the other hand, cannot stand soccer, and inside, as your spouse is talking about soccer, you cringe, or have a temptation to say something snooty. What do you do? Should you bring out those negative things and present them to your spouse? Or should you keep that to yourself and choose to smile and show support and encouragement to your spouse for their enthusiasm?

True love demands the latter. In fact, the test of your own character and where you are on the road to sanctity is primarily in these moments of having to endure and suffer through that which your spouse enjoys but you do not. A fundamental, practical purpose of marriage in God’s plan for us is to purify our souls through these moments where we must bear the other person.

What if the person wants to talk about something you heard a hundred times before and you don’t really want to waste time listening to it again? This is another occasion to show your compatibility; your willingness to bear with the other. When you do it out of love, you can endure it joyfully, not begrudgingly. That is very important. People can tell when you are not really paying attention. It’s important that compatibility be understood to be the patient endurance with another with JOY!! You accept that you should endure, and you love the person enough to show genuine interest in enduring.

We say a person is “unbearable” sometimes. These moments are perhaps a good time to go on retreat or at least go out for a ride in the car to take a break and collect yourself. Better to do that than to allow the other to see you blow up or do something else hurtful during a time that you should have shown a more loving endurance.

One thing is for certain. We are called as Christians by Jesus to bear one another. “Bear with one another” means to be “compatible”. We are all capable of suffering patiently through difficult times with another person. God’s grace given to us as Christians assures us of that. If we do not, it is to our own detriment, and a wasted opportunity to be perfected and develop good character.

Too often, good relationships are destroyed (sometimes very slowly over time) because of one or both selfishly behave uncharitably toward the other by refusing to share the other’s interests. An abusive level is reached when the one not only does not want to endure it, but also seeks to make the other feel bad about what they are trying to share; to break their spirit. This kind of behavior causes serious damage to relationships, because these acts hurt both persons simultaneously.

It would serve us all well to stop thinking of marriage as happy only when both persons have common interests and similarities that make the feelings of love ever present. Marriage is much more about enduring and bearing the other patiently. It is much better for our salvation if we learn that true love bears all things patiently, kindly and honestly.

Compatibility is primarily about yourself. You must ask, “Am I capable of patiently enduring another person when I don’t feel like listening to what they want to share, or doing what they want to do? Am I capable of allowing another person to grow into the person they are meant to be even if it means suffering?"

If yes, you are a compatible person for anyone you choose, because it is YOU who has to be ready to love when it is hardest to do so. Two people with this compatibility about themselves are able to have a happy and lasting marriage.

Comments (Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)
Debbie's Gravatar I have to disagree with you on this one.

Compatibility is more than interests. It is shared values and personality fit. Couples need a shared mission and purpose. A relationship just won't work if two people have different value systems. They are "incompatible." Two assertive, aggressive partners will constantly clash trying to lead while two passive people will stagnate and drift. Those personalities are incompatible. All these relationships are very likely to result in affairs and divorce.

Interests like sports, sewing, cooking, etc are on the minor end of the spectrum.
# Posted By Debbie | 6/23/10 4:59 PM
anonymous's Gravatar I agree, that compatibility is enduring each other. Contrary to the norm that says that usually men are the older ones, my mother is 16 years "older" than my father and in this case, my father is the one younger. Some people might think that I am lying because it's not common, but I am telling the truth. (This is contrary to what usually happens, that the man is usually the "older" one), my mom didn't want anything to do with him when they met because of the age difference, she said he insisted for more than one year, and was mature enough that, more than 30 years later, and against the odds, seeing so many others divorced, there they are.

So, to women, I also say, don't be afraid of contacting or being contacted by men who are younger, if they want to talk to you, don't reject them. I see many women on AMS that put a limit to maybe 2 to 3 years younger than themselves. I'm not encouraging with this that they should be now concentrating on that age group, but what I'm saying is that at least, leave the door open for a younger man to contact you, should that be God's plan for you.
# Posted By anonymous | 6/23/10 5:25 PM
Mary Anne's Gravatar This is an excellent article which highlights the necessity of unceasing true love and sacrifice for one's beloved. Yes, this is certainly an essential element to be mutually and faithfully practiced within a couple considering (as well as those in) Holy Matrimony. Although your article states clear points which may be obvious to some of us, I am so glad you took the time to spell them out point blank for those who need a refresher or enlightenment in this intrinsic part of Holy Matrimony. Thank you, Mr. Buono!

May God grant you and your family many more blessings via the Immaculate Heart of Our Most Blessed Mother!
# Posted By Mary Anne | 6/23/10 5:25 PM
Mike's Gravatar Marriages do not end with nullity. A declaration of nullity means that the church has determined that a valid sacramental marriage did not exist at the time it was entered into by the couple. Once you are validly married you are always married until death of one of the spouses.
# Posted By Mike | 6/23/10 5:30 PM
anonymous's Gravatar This is just my opinion:
I got Anthony’s point. I just would like to ad that besides all that compatibility of things that I’m willing to accept from the other person, I would say, make sure that those things are not contrary to what you consider important; it may be your faith and your standards; once you make a commitment for life there is no turning back. If that person likes to go for example to clubs, and you don’t, or drinks and you don’t, or he/she is too flirty and you are not, and that really bothers you, or, in the case of a man, would you accept that the woman you date dresses in a ways that shows part of her body to other men who see her?, and, are you willing to accept those things? Remember that only God can change someone.

My point is that there are things that some of us consider as very important, and we need to make sure that we’re not blinded by “hormones” when dating and make sure we will be able to deal with those things later in life. It’s not fare to say later: I’m getting an annulment for things that we already knew existed in the other person from the very beginning.

I would suggest, about things such as football, soccer, etc, those are important but minor things comparing to more serious matters of faith and morals. Are we willing to deal with someone that could potentially endanger our faith life just because we like them? I personally think that there are things that are not negotiable; just look at yourself and the way you live your daily life, including the way you practice your faith, and picture someone next to you who thinks differently on things that you consider important, or that could compromise your faith life. Will you be able to live with such person for the rest of your life?

Also, for example, men who want younger women to have “a lot” of children. Have you considered the fact that maybe she might not be able to conceive at all? Or even maybe you? Will you still love him/her? My point is, just be careful with our motives, we may be wrong. Let us not use the other person to satisfy our motives. May the reason for us to get married be real love for the other person. What are our real reasons? Even if what happens next may be infertility, an accident (God forbids), an illness. Will you love that person no matter what?

Remember Proverbs 31:30 “Charm is deceptive and beauty fleeting; the woman who fears the Lord is to be praised” ...Well, I would say, as a women, to apply that to men, as well, a man who fears the Lord is to be praised.
# Posted By anonymous | 6/23/10 7:10 PM
Peter's Gravatar Nice article Anthony! The trick in learning to suffer-with patiently for another requires a possession of self in maturity; otherwise, one will be left feeling deeply frustrated that his/her "own" needs to express and be heard are not being met. One runs the risk of repressing one's emotions or falling into a "door-mat" mentality. Rational guidance of emotions (anger, frustration, impatience) is important when the husband is having to listen/love his wife patiently.
# Posted By Peter | 6/24/10 8:46 AM
anonymous's Gravatar I agree with Debbie (the first comment) where she says:
"Couples need a shared mission and purpose. A relationship just won't work if two people have different value systems. They are "incompatible"

I couldn't agree more with that phrase because I saw that in my own parents. For example, my dad liked to watch "cartoons", yes, a grown up man watching cartoons with his children, and my mother literaly coulnd't stand cartoons, but she didn't argue about it, they had other things that were more important for them, and a common value system, a common way of living and sharing their faith, a compatibility in their mission and ministry in Church and in the way they looked at things that really matter to them. So, cartoons, was really no problem for my mom to endure, but we went to Church together, we did many things as a family, together, and I always heard them have almost similar way of thinking when it came to making important decisions in our family (not 100% of the time), but my mom could have that trust in my dad as his decission coming from God. I talk in past because my father passed away.
Looks, money, food or sports don't really matter that much as the "common" ground of how they live their lives, their faith and their values.
Thanks, God bless
# Posted By anonymous | 6/24/10 12:22 PM
HR's Gravatar Excellent article with excellent points! However, I also agree with other commentators that some sort of similarity is necessary: having the same Faith, values, interests, philosophies on life, wanting the same number of children, personalities that suit one another, etc.

In light of this, maybe its fair to say that relationships begin with common interests and suited personalities, but they are made or broken by each person's ability to love when it is hardest to do so.
# Posted By HR | 6/24/10 3:29 PM
Rachelle's Gravatar Hello Anthony! Your answer regarding this thing of compatibility has enlightened me a lot... I could therefore conclude that in order to be compatible with the other, there should be 'love' in the first place. Because, you could never suffer or sacrifice something if it was not for love... I am not sure if it was a good experience... I knew someone and prayed for him everyday. It's true that as you get to know someone, it is also possible to fall in love with him. I knew what his interests are, favorite food, favorite past times and shows to watch. Most of those things aren't my interests but, I have learned to be interested with those so I could be able to relate with him everytime we would communicate... But, I d'm not sure if I am only impatient or that he is a "sampler" that until now we just communicate through text and sometimes thru the internet. I would tell myself and to God, "He is so lucky that someone is ready to love him to the point of going beyond what I want." I hope you could say something about it. It'll be a very BIG help. Thanks Anthony!
# Posted By Rachelle | 7/6/10 11:49 PM
anon.'s Gravatar A very nice post, Anthony. I would say, however, that your advice could be potentially misleading to a woman who is in love. This in two ways:

1. Many a woman has fallen in love with a man who is not, in fact, good for her. But a woman in love can suffer gladly all kinds of terrible issues in her man: problems with alcohol, gambling, chastity, honesty, ability to finish things, unwillingness to commit, etc.. So for any woman who is in love and therefore "heroically" suffering a man's bad character (or even just suffocating personal differences), it is important that she learn to distinguish among the kinds of things she is legitimately called to bear at the dating stage.

Women in love don't need to be reminded to suffer their man; they need more to be reminded, I think, to distinguish among difficulties. Some things no woman should bear in a dating relationship, and a woman should guard her heart and use her reason to choose what is truly good for her future happiness, her future children, and her own salvation. That he loves playing video games might just be a quirk, but it might also be a sign of really deep problems. At the dating stage, it's important to keep asking such questions rather than simply suffering the other.

2. Self-knowledge is absolutely critical in finding a spouse. This is not to say that a woman should have a huge list of non-negotiables, but of course it's also important for a woman to know herself well enough-- and respect her own self-awareness enough-- to also not be open to seriously dating ANY good man that shows an interest. It has always been my thought that if a woman doesn't like a good man very much after a couple dates, maybe he's just meant for somebody else. Don't hold him back from that woman! There's no need to expend time and emotion on crazy-long-shot relationships with people you aren't very excited about.

So while there are marriages between people of much different ages or education levels or economic backgrounds, those are exceptions and do not mean that any woman will be able to happily marry someone who is radically different from her in those ways but still a good man. A woman's self-knowledge and her ability to accept the consequences of her decisions (including the ability to accept a life of being single) seem pretty key in all this, I'd say.

But once a person is in a solid relationship that is going well, then yes: absolutely no nit-picking! Celebrate the other, deal graciously with their quirks, and honor the ways in which they are different. All the things you wrote above. =)

Just my 2 cents, mostly directed at any ardently in love woman out there who would try to use your very good advice to rationalize sticking it out with a man who she knows deep down is really not good for her. [Sweetie, you know who you are! Gather yourself together, and move on. You WILL be fine! And once you've separated from him, you will have new hope for happiness with somebody who is all the things you really do need in a man. Trust your instincts, and have courage!]

Thanks so much for a great blog, Anthony! =)
# Posted By anon. | 7/9/10 10:00 AM